~ And Rebuilding And Healing The World In The Process ~
“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.” – Thomas Jefferson
“I pray we shall crush the moneyed aristocracy in its infancy, for already it bids defiance to our laws and seeks a contest of strength with our democratic government.” – Thomas Jefferson, 1812
“Once a nation parts with the control of its currency and credit, it matters not who makes the nations laws. Usury, once in control, will wreck any nation. Until the control of the issue of currency and credit is restored to government and recognized as its most sacred responsibility, all talk of the sovereignty of parliament and of democracy is idle and futile.” – William Lyon Mackenzie King (1874-1950) Prime Minister of Canada, Founder of the Bank of Canada
“There’s a class war going on alright – and we’re winning.”
– Warren Buffet
“We will coup whoever we want! Deal with it.” – Elon Musk
“Let them eat bugs.” – Bill Gates
Some paint a rosy picture of the West, which is clearly moving rapidly from corporate oligarchy to fascism. Some paint a rosy picture of Communist China as a better alternative. I most definitely reject them both. Both are forms of authoritarianism and tyranny, and neither is compatible with democracy, freedom, constitutional rule or human rights. We can and must do better than these two mutually toxic regimes. It is time for a great reset, alright – but one designed by the people, for the people, and not by the literally fascist business elite – and with liberty and justice for all.
*
“Truth is not whatever you want it to be. It is what it is. And you must bend to its power or live a lie.” – Miyamoto Musashi
Both privatization and state control of the economy have proved to be deeply problematic, to put it mildly. In fact, both of have been disastrous. Both have sown great ecological destruction, and each of them has sown its own kind of tyranny. You can have the tyranny of the state, or you can have the tyranny of being ruled by giant corporate empires, monopolies and cartels.
Well, how about freedom, for a change? How about no tyranny, instead of choosing between the flavour of tyranny we shall have? Marxist-Leninists, or the Chinese mandarins and technocrats of Beijing, will bring you one kind of tyranny. Milton Friedman and the Chicago Boys, with their “Washington consensus” of neoconservative/neoliberal “free market” ideology – which means freedom for the giant corporations and the super-rich, and discipline, if not poverty and chains, for everybody else – will bring you a kind of neo-feudal corporatism that represents another kind of tyranny. But maybe the people are sick of tyranny by now. Maybe they want to choose something better. It think it is time. And I think the people are ready for something better.
Rather than giant corporate empires controlling the commons, and rather than the state controlling the commons, there is a third way, which does not involve the snake oil peddling of people like Tony Blair, and his trained poodle show, but instead, involves empowering the people at the level of the grassroots. It is neither the state nor private empires that are best fit to govern the commons. The people themselves are best fit to govern the commons, history unsurprisingly shows, since it is an axiom that power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. And moreover, the people are best fit to govern themselves, likewise.
This is the direction that we must move: not towards ever greater concentration and centralization of power – power is already dangerously and greatly hyper-concentrated and over-centralized; but towards decentralization of power, which means, towards greater democracy and greater freedom.
The business elite, the global corporate elite, want to consolidate all power in their hands. That should rightly make sensible people deeply wary. We have tried that before, and it has failed, and failed repeatedly. We tried that with Stalin, with Mao, with Hitler and with Mussolini, with Pinochet, and with a whole string of Third World dictators. When we gather together all power in society into the hands of the few, tyranny is the inevitable result.
I can think of only one example of where it worked well, and that was in Tibet, where they had something akin to Plato’s vision of the philosopher kings – and even with regards to Tibet, the Dalai Lama has said that the Tibetan people are ready for democracy. But Tibet, remember, was a rare exception – everywhere else that we look in history or in the world today, when all power is concentrated in a few hands at the top, in great pyramids of top-down control, tyranny results, and the result is a nightmare society, and a gulag.
Some people say that contemporary China is a good model, a better model, because China acted swiftly and effectively on covid, or because China has a strong and growing economy – but China is a totalitarian police state. Just look at their social credit system, which is tied into their contact tracing and surveillance system, which is also tied into their new digital currency and payments system, where if you spit on the sidewalk, or jaywalk, or, heaven forbid, say something critical of the government, you can find yourself barred from getting on a train or bus or plane, or taking out a loan or a mortgage, or simply placed under permanent house arrest. I think we should think twice before importing that model to the West, or to the rest of the world. But that is precisely what the Davos billionaire club of the new global corporate empire is actively doing right now, and with break-neck speed: they are importing the totalitarian model from China across the West and around the world.
Then there are others who are critical, quite sensibly, of both corporate tyranny and authoritarian statism, who want to dissolve or radically shrink the government. They do not understand that, we must first decentralize power to the nation-state, from its current globalized hyper-concentration in the hands of unelected and unaccountable corporate elites. That first step is crucial, and cannot be bypassed. This is absolutely critical for us to understand now.
Only when we have wrested power from the billionaire corporate elite, who are now transnational and globalist, as well as being quite literally fascist, by temporarily strengthening nation-states and national democracies, can we have any hope of freedom. Later, in the future, and potentially soon, we can decentralize the powers of the nation-state, in turn. But we must get the order right, and not put the cart before the horse, or we will not achieve freedom or democracy, constitutional rule or respect for our inalienable human rights, but will only achieve a permanence and consolidation of the currently reigning empire, which is now a form of global plutocracy, and a literally fascist global corporate rule. If we do not soon come to understand this core reality, and precisely what must be done about it, then we are doomed to a future that is dark and dystopian indeed.
While the class warfare continues to be waged by the 1% against the 99%, and the corresponding economic warfare and psychological warfare intensify, along with the war on democracy, the faux left seeks crumbs for the masses. It is appalling, disgusting, and morally bankrupt.
We must have regulation of the biggest corporations, and especially of the financial sectors in Wall Street, Bay Street and the City of London; we must tax currency speculation; we must put in place sensible and strong anti-trust action, along with capital controls; we must close the tax loopholes and tax all personal income over $1 million a year at 90%, and all personal wealth over $100 million at 90%, and use it to end poverty and green our society; we must abrogate and reject any and all “trade deals” that place corporate powers over and above the powers of sovereign democratic parliaments; and we must create publicly owned, democratic central banks, with sound money and sound monetary policies that benefit the people, and not just the richest fraction of a percent. These are among the core, concrete steps that we must take if we are serious about economic recovery and prosperity, jobs for all, or are concerned about having any possibility for serious action on either social justice or the environment, or any possibility of resisting the global take-over and fascist architecture that is currently being imposed by both the Western corporate elite of Davos and the Chinese Communist Party of Beijing, who are now in a joint partnership to rule the world. All talk about minimum wage, UBI or inclusivity, health care, environmental protection, climate action, or financial relief for the people, is idle and futile talk, essentially, until and unless we have the courage and the clarity of mind to do these few essential and urgently needed things, which can no longer be avoided. The people, both left and right, need to stop squabbling and stop day dreaming, and unite; then get on with dealing with reality.
*
An important aside should be mentioned here. Some still think Bitcoin is a passing fad, but the best economic analysts that I know of, all say that Bitcoin is here to say, and is going to reach mass adoption level soon, at which time, it will replace the US dollar as the preferred mode of transaction and most used currency globally. My point here is that while I agree that Bitcoin is far superior to fiat paper money, which is prone to inevitable devaluation and ultimate collapse; and it is vastly preferable to any government- or corporate-controlled, or central bank-controlled digital currency, because it is decentralized and resistant to censorship, manipulation, or authoritarian impulses or schemes; and while it is a far safer, more secure store of value (for savings and investment, along with gold, silver and heritage seeds), since it is encrypted, cannot be stolen or confiscated, has a finite and fixed supply, and thus does not devalue, but will continue to increase in value, despite short-term volatility; and while it will indeed help, and probably help greatly, in decentralizing the control of money, exchange and trade, and thus remove monopoly and cartel players, such as states and giant corporations, from unduly stifling or controlling free human interaction and exchange, and will greatly diminish the powers of the banking and financial elite; despite all that, I do not believe that Bitcoin alone can solve all our problems. I think that should be clear enough. I think it would be unwise if not dangerously naïve to blindly assume that it can.
Crossing our fingers and hoping for the best is not a sound strategy for dangerous times. We at least need fallback strategies, complimentary strategies, and contingency plans, not just in mind, but executed and in place, so that we do not put all our hopes in a new technology, be it Bitcoin or any other, to be our salvation.
At the very least, we should also look to other ways to reign in the big corporations, the billionaire plutocracy, and especially the banking elite, who now effectively rule the world. In short, while I think Bitcoin is a smart long-term investment and store of value, as well as a proven viable means of economic transaction, exchange and trade, on local, national and international levels, right now, it is not technology which will save us, though indeed it will play an important role.
A quick summary of the last 50 years is needed here. (We will go into much more detail in a moment, below.) With the birth of neoliberalism and corporate globalization, and the financialization of the economy which accompanied it, which began 50 years ago, in 1971, the West, and the US in particular, slowed, and then eventually, by and large, stopped investing in infrastructure and R&D, while offshoring production and profits both. That is precisely the set of policies and trends which must be reversed. We must de-financialize the economy, reverse the deregulation of the economy, and particularly the banking sector, rebuild the real economy, and invest in infrastructure, research and development; and along with that, and in order to do that, we must have three elements brought swiftly into place: We must unite the people, we must dethrone the globalist and quite literally fascist corporate/banker oligarchy, and we must have a fresh vision for going forward. I have outlined both the problems and the strategic path and policy vision needed, in over 500 published papers and my first two published books, Enlightened Democracy, and, The People vs The Elite. Now, we will go into further detail here in terms of the political philosophy, the political-economic policy platform, and the very achievable but also very bold vision that we need to transcend and resolve our very pressing and urgent problems in the early 21st century, to create real freedom, real democracy, and a better world for all.
Policy, vision and philosophy, and a fresh approach to politics, economics, and life in general, is what will save us from the dark age we are now heading into with all speed. Banning and abolishing private central banks and creating democratically controlled public central banks, along with sensible legislation to reign in the corporate giants, remove big money from electoral politics, reverse the financialization of the economy, and to restore actual functioning democracy, along with human rights, constitutional rule and freedom, is the greater and most central task ahead. Bitcoin can aid in that process of dethroning the ruling banking elite and the global corporate plutocracy, but we need to look to other, bold methods, as well. There is no way around this. It simply must happen, and now.
As to political philosophy: Do I side with Karl Marx, Milton Friedman or Klaus Schwabbe, representing (1) statist oligarchy, (2) neoliberal globalization and state-sponsored capitalism, and (3) technocratic corporate fascism, respectively? None of the above. I side with Jefferson, who was far more prescient, and had far more common sense, than any of the three.
I’ll take Jefferson in the short term, and most definitely so, over Marx, Friedman, or the neo-fascists of the likes of Davos and Klaus Schwabe – let us, that is, restore a functioning constitutional democracy, free from any elitist or authoritarian control fetishes, and let the people democratically decide the rest; and Kropotkin in the long term, when we are ready for something that takes freedom and democracy to a further, higher level yet.
Please read on, and we will “unpack” these great and pressing, world-shaping issues together.
“To change something, build a new model that makes the old model obsolete.”
– Buckminster Fuller
*
Here is just one example of how profoundly lost “the left” is at present, for critical perspective and context. I will show my own response to a Twitter comment by Jimmy Dore, who is generally lucid and quite sensible, which in turn was Jimmy Dore’s response to Bernie Sanders, who in 2020, completely caved in to the big money controlled Democratic party establishment, and the rule of Wall Street and the City of London over all.
While the class warfare continues to be waged by the 1% against the 99%, and the corresponding economic warfare and psychological warfare intensify, along with the war on democracy, the faux left seeks crumbs for the masses. It is appalling, disgusting, and morally bankrupt.
Here is an example. Remember, without officially backing out of the 2020 US presidential race, and being open and honest about it, Bernie stopped campaigning in the spring of 2020, effectively throwing the fight, though he was in a position to win the US presidential race, easily beating the befuddled Biden and callous Kamala.
Now he is boasting about getting a one-time pittance cheque of financial relief for the people, which for most families doesn’t even cover a single month’s living expenses, while he simultaneously sold the people out, along with AOC and all the “progressives” in Congress, in voting for a nearly $2 trillion relief package for the Wall Street corporate elite. Even the “leading” “progressives” are selling the people down the river. Here is Bernie boasting of his bread crumb championship on Twitter:
Bernie Sanders
@BernieSanders
“What will the $1,400 direct payments in the American Rescue Plan mean for you and your family?”
Mar 18, 2021·Twitter
To which, Jimmy Dore responded:
“It means you all failed spectacularly again and Democrats will be the minority party in 2022.”
@jimmydore Mar 18, 2021·Twitter
We must look more deeply. And we must be far more bold, or we will be slaves.
*
How did the first Great Depression come about? It was a combination of drought, financial speculation, wild over-leveraging by the moneyed elite, and deregulation (actually a basic absence of regulation). And what do we have now, in 2021? Severe and escalating ecological crisis is causing recurring and increasingly severe storms, floods, landslides, wildfires, crop failure, and drought. Financial speculation is at an all-time high – far higher than in the roaring ’20s which preceded the crash of ’29. And Slick Willie Bill Clinton, and other neoliberal and neoconservative crony capitalists, have deregulated the economic and financial system – which was not fixed after the first major tremor hit, in the financial crisis of 2008. (Remember that I warned of that coming crisis beforehand, when everyone was saying that things are just rosy, and would remain that way.) The tsunami is coming, and few are prepared. Few even see it, and very few dare to imagine it, though it be very, very real.
In light of that impending economic crash that is now heading our way, and in light of the global take-over of the world by big business, with its attendent class warfare, economic warfare and psychological warfare, and war on democracy, an examination of the options for protecting and aiding the people is in order, and is desperately needed now.
Beware the military industrial media complex.
“Those who have put out men’s eyes reproach them of their blindness.”
– Milton
Clarity and leadership are not to be found from the media talking heads, nor from the ostensibly ruling figure heads of government who are the political elite; nor, certainly, from the billionaire corporate elite, who are now busy devouring the planet and the people, along with their freedoms and their democracy.
“Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” – Lord Acton
“Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others.”
– Winston Churchill
Let’s shed a little light on the subject of democracy vs plutocracy. It is high time, and urgently needed now.
*
Nearly 90 years ago, it was FDR, the New Deal, and the United States, which led the world out of the Great Depression. In 2021, while most of the world continues to stagnate, and to slide toward social, political and economic implosion, it is Andres Obrador, Mexico, Bitcoin, and the entrepreneurs of Nigeria, among others, who are leading the world out of the economic mire. History makes for strange bedfellows indeed, and many remarkable surprises.
Upon his election in 2018, Mexico’s new President, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador announced the first phase of his New Deal with an “Every Young Person to Work” program inspired by FDR which he described saying:
“I have had this idea since I read how President Franklin Delano Roosevelt pulled the United States out of the 1930s’ crisis. What did he do, in a tremendous economic crisis? He decided to put the whole U.S. people to work. And he decided to put young people to work, and he paid them a dollar a day, for every young person. But his idea was full employment. That is, a job for everyone. That idea stuck in my head, because Roosevelt lifted the United States out of the crisis, and for me, he was therefore, if not the best President, one of the best that the United States has had—Franklin Delano Roosevelt, by that action, by that decision. Now we are going to do something similar: All young people to work.”
This is what the US, UK, Canada, Europe, and most nations of the world need: a new vision, a new social contract, and a New Deal that serves the people, the 99%, and that creates jobs and economic vitality, and rebuilds the nations of the world, post-lockdown. Tax the super-rich and the giant corporations, and above all, tax financial speculation, and use that vast wealth to build green infrastructure, creating full employment and economic prosperity in the process – while, most critically, safeguarding and strengthening democracy, freedom, constitutional rule and human rights. And I think Ellen Brown is right: all positive change hinges on freeing the people from the stranglehold that the international banking elite has on them and on the democracies and nations of the world – and that, in turn, hinges on the creation of a democratically controlled public central bank for each sovereign nation. Without that, we will remain serfs, and will continue our rapid slide from serfdom, into slavery.
“You have enemies? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something,
sometime in your life.” – Winston Churchill
“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.” – Winston Churchill
“It ain’t over ’till it’s over.” – Yogi Berra
*
Mexico, with a new President, AMLO (his initials), is throwing off the disastrous policies of neoliberalism and corporate globalization, which decimated the country over the preceding 36 years, and, most critically, is rebuilding the nation and the economy while retaining and strengthening constitutional democracy. In that sense, and for these reasons, Mexico under Andres Obrador’s leadership, is truly showing leadership for the world, while the US, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Europe, are being turned into Third World police states, run by and for the global, frankly neo-fascist corporate elite.
Here is Ellen Brown on the new Mexico, which is now rising from the ashes, like a phoenix taking wing:
“The new president has held to his campaign promises. In 2019, his first year in office, he did what Donald Trump pledged to do — “drain the swamp” — purging the government of technocrats and institutions he considered corrupt, profligate or impeding the transformation of Mexico after 36 years of failed market-focused neoliberal policies. Other accomplishments have included substantially increasing the minimum wage while cutting top government salaries and oversize pensions; making small loans and grants directly to farmers; guaranteeing crop prices for key agricultural crops; launching programs to benefit youth, the disabled and the elderly; and initiating a $44 billion infrastructure plan. López Obrador’s goal, he says, is to construct a “new paradigm” in economic policy that improves human welfare, not just increases gross domestic product.””
*
“Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.”
– Winston Churchill
“A fanatic is one who can’t change his mind and won’t change the subject.” – Winston Churchill
“Personally, I’m always ready to learn, although I do not always like being taught.” – Winston Churchill
We need to not only think outside the box – we need to smash the boxes, shatter the walls of our thinking, and draw on the best ideas and models, from wherever we can find them.
“The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes.” – Winston Churchill
The grassroots moderate right, meaning libertarians on the right, and many conservatives, understand that a privately owned central bank, such as the Fed or ECB, can never be trusted to serve the people, but instead serves transnational banking elites, at the great suffering and expense of the people, along with the demise of democracy, freedom, sovereignty, and the real, productive economy as well. The left needs to clue into that central fact. But the right needs to overcome its ideological fetish which makes it fanatically scream like Dark Age priests whenever anyone suggests that government programs can do some good for the people; or, when anyone suggests, or shows with conclusive, overwhelming evidence, that laissez-faire capitalism and deregulation are a social, ecological and economic disaster, which they indisputably are. Both the left and the right have blind spots, and giant ones, and both are clueless in certain important regards.
“A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.”
– Ralph Waldo Emerson
John Lennon said, and he was right:
“You think you’re so clever and classless and free, but you’re still fucking peasants as far as I can see.”
And to that I would add, You think you’re so pious, and sanctified indeed, but you’re still squabbling children, as far as I can see.
Remember this: It was Abraham Lincoln, a Republican President, who issued the Emancipation Proclamation, abolishing slavery. It was Teddy Roosevelt, a Republican President, who defied the corrupted Democratic party establishment, as well as the corrupted Republican party establishment, and, riding on a wave of democratic populist uprising, challenged the richest man in America, John D. Rockefeller, and the biggest corporation in America, Standard Oil, using anti-trust legislation against a company thought to be “too big to fail”, and won important landmark victories. And it was Dwight D. Eisenhower, a Republican President, who, in his farewell address to the nation, gave us his ominous message, to, “beware the military industrial complex.” The liberals and the left tend to think that they have a monopoly on virtue, intelligence, and common sense. Clearly, they do not. Let the petty bickering be over. We have serious disagreements, yes, it is true. But we have more in common than we have differences between us. And we have common cause. If the people cannot now see, that it truly is, as Vandana Shiva has said, Oneness vs The 1%, or as the title of my own work expressed it, The People vs The Elite, then we are frankly doomed to a future none of us would wish to imagine, much less be a party to.
First, we must unite the people, in order to remove the sociopaths at the top, from their position as de facto rulers of the world. Then, we can come back, and debate and discuss, every other issue under the sun. First things first: remove the plutocrats from power. That will require unity. And we have no time to lose.
Dogma, and the idolatry of ideology, must be swept aside. We must now take a fresh look at things, or remain imprisoned, and effectively neutered and self-eviscerating, by way of our stubborn clinging to our narrow and outworn preconceptions. We need a resurgence and rediscovery of our power, our basic dignity, and our confidence – and we need a corresponding resurgence of basic humility and open-mindedness to go with it. Above all, we must unite the people – unite the 99%, or at least the great majority, all of whom are now peasants and serfs, and understand that we have common ground and common cause, and a common opponent, in the ruling 1%. Without these factors in place, and reaffirmed, our future will remain nothing but bleak, and positively dystopian.
*
The Central Problem
The problems of the world are many, but the central problem is, as Aldous Huxley indicated: a vast over-centralization of power. You do not need any kind of “conspiracy theory” to see the obvious, undeniable fact: “the moneyed aristocracy”, as Thomas Jefferson called them, the business elite, have taken over. Remember that Jesus drove the money changers from the temple. This is not a new problem; however, we have let the problem go on so long without seriously addressing it, that we now face a dystopian world that is ruled by self-serving plutocrats and billionaire corporate oligarchs. The great majority of the people now know that this is the undeniable, obvious truth. The question is, what are we going to do about it?
I am not anti-business, but I am certainly anti-fascist. And if the people persist in allowing a tiny handful of global bankers and other billionaire business elites to effectively rule the world, and bend every nation to its will, then the result will be global fascism. How much more clear can this be?
“Conspiracy theory is a term that is used to poo-poo institutional analysis.” – Noam Chomsky
Remember that fascism does not necessarily mean people in Nazi uniforms goose-stepping in the streets before giant banners. Fascism is more malleable than that – and contemporary fascists have become masters of camouflage and PR. Fascism, although it always has a scapegoat, or several of them, is not even necessarily racist. What is the essential core of fascism, is a hyper-concentration of power in the hands of a very small number of people, in a pyramidal and hierarchical power structure, which is decidedly opposed to any real or meaningful, functioning democracy. That, we clearly have now, and world-wide.
It is a multi-cultural, multi-racial, gay- and women-friendly, “inclusive”, “sustainable” and cosmopolitan, even humanitarian face, that the Western corporate oligarchy presents to the world, but it is fascist plutocracy nonetheless, to its rotting black heart. Make no mistake.
You can put lipstick on a pig, but it will still remain a pig. What we have now in the West is corporate fascism with a progressive liberal face, but it is still fascism.
*
Political Philosophy, and Political Reality
I reference Chomsky often, simply because he is one of the best minds in terms of institutional analysis, that is, political-economic and social analysis. That does not mean he is infallible, of course. None of us should pretend to omniscience. And I’ve seen Chomsky be flatly wrong on at least three major subjects. But he is generally correct in his views, and is in general extremely lucid. And I agree with him on several major points, which are relevant here.
“If the Nuremburg Trials were held today, every US President since WWII would be hung.”
“It’s not that the elite like torture. They’re just indifferent to it.”
The English philosopher Thomas Hobbes’ answer to human problems was to concentrate power in the hands of an elite few, who would keep the rest from tearing each others’ throats out. He famously wrote that life before “civilization” was “nasty, brutish and short”. He knew nothing of anthropology, which had yet to be invented, and knew nothing of the longer history of humanity. He simply assumed that his own cut-throat society of 17th century Europe, with its incessant warring tribes, and its conniving, scheming, deceitful, duplicitous and petty tyrants, was the universal norm of humanity, and he presumed that things must have been even worse before great and holy kings came to power. His view of humanity is dark, pessimistic, cynical, and jaundiced in the extreme, and based in pure ignorance and projection. But it was his recipe for politics which is most troubling: concentrate all power in the hands of a ruling elite, because human beings cannot be trusted with power. How much more obviously self-contradictory can this be? If you do not trust people with power, then why would you give some people great and vast powers? Thomas Jefferson destroyed the Hobbesian fallacy and rationalization for oligarchic elite rule, in a single line:
“If you can’t trust men to govern themselves, how can you trust them to govern others?”
Again, the problems we see in human society are manyfold, and have many causes, but the central and most common root, is a grossly excessive concentration and over-centralization of power. All social orders are human creations – whether we realize it or not. And when you create a social order that is based upon hierarchical power structures, and with great concentrations of power, what you get is a magnet for corruption and for sociopaths. Good people are attracted to positions of leadership, to be sure; but so too, are corrupt and self-serving individuals and sociopaths strongly attracted to positions of power. What’s more, when power is decentralized, then abuses of power are small, because no one person or group has great power. But when power is highly concentrated and highly centralized, then great abuses of power become possible, and become virtually guaranteed. The problem, therefore, is not a question of who is in power, but what power structures do we have, or do we tolerate.
Placing strict limits on any form of concentrated power in human society, therefore, should be viewed as a matter of common sense. That must include, of course, the political powers, namely the government; the military, paramilitary, police and “intelligence” powers; religious powers, namely the church (freedom of religion, conscience and belief is essential, and so too, is separation of church and state – for the protection of both); cultural powers, namely the media, the advertising industry, and the rest of the PR industry; and also economic powers – namely, the giant corporations, which must now be broken up, and the billionaire elite, whose vast wealth must be redistributed (with a 100% tax on all personal wealth over $100 million), not so much for reasons of wealth distribution, but for reasons of reigning in their economic power, which now has come to overrule and to effectively eviscerate and nullify the peoples’ democracies.
Decentralization of powers, in horizontal networks and federations of shared power, and the break up and abolition of any form of hyper-concentrated power – commonly known as political, military, economic or financial empires – is akin to mutual disarmament. We can either have mutual disarmament, or we can have an ever-escalating arms race that will end, finally, in our own self-annihilation. The same is true, and even more fundamentally true, and more urgent, with regards to mutual disarmament in the sense of dissolving all excessive concentrations of power – including above all, the Fortune 1,000 biggest corporations, and the financial empires of the super-rich. We can either respond boldly, swiftly and with common sense, by addressing the roots of the problem, rather than papering them over with pretty words and superficial, grossly inadequate, mild reforms and cosmetic changes; or we can watch the world descend rapidly into a dystopian dark age of neo-feudal corporate oligarchy and fascism. These are our only two choices remaining now – and the sensible choice, requires bold and swift action, and nothing less.
We know now from studies in human psychology that there is roughly 1% of the population who are sociopaths. Presumably it is a similar level in all societies and in all ages, though there may be major variances. We can expect, therefore, that a small percentage of people, in any age and any society, will be so cold-blooded and callous, as to be willing to do absolutely anything in the pursuit of their own greed, narrow self-interest, self-aggrandizement, and power. This should not be shocking to anyone.
I firmly believe that Chomsky was right in saying that, “The great majority of people have basically decent impulses.” (And science has confirmed that fact. See Rifkin, The Empathic Civilization, Eisler, The Chalice and The Blade, Bookchin, The Ecology of Freedom, and Kropotkin, Mutual Aid.) This explains why most people find it hard to imagine that anyone could behave in such evil ways – most people want to be happy, but they are not willing to step on someone else’s throat, in order to achieve what they think will make them happy: and so, they imagine that all human beings have such restraint, conscience, compassion, or basic human decency – but this is an erroneous assumption, for clearly, not all do. Naiveté has never been a very good protection against the evil that exists in the world. A sober-minded optimism, which deals squarely with the good and the evil, the noble and the ignoble, the sensible and the deluded, and the deranged, is a better way to proceed.
Do not underestimate what the sociopathic few are willing to do in order to further their own self-interests, their accumulation of never-ending vast wealth, their hubris and infantile sense of grandiosity, and their lust for power. Can it happen here? Can fascism, that is, happen again, and happen here? It not only can, it has. It is here.
Remember too, that Mussolini, who invented modern fascism, and so is properly fit to define it, said that fascism is properly called corporatism – and it is the merger of the business elite with the state. That too, we have now.
Or we can look at how FDR defined fascism: it is the take-over of government by big business. Anyway you look at it, what we have now is not liberal democracy, as even the Ivy league colleges confirm, but oligarchy, plutocracy, corporatism, and however you want to name it, it is the merger of business with the state, whereby, outside of China, North Korea, Cuba and North Vietnam, almost universally, big business has taken over the governments of the world. That, by any reasonable definition, is fascism.
China, under neo-Maoist/Leninist/corporatist rule, is the mirror image of the corporate neo-feudalism, technocracy or corporate fascism of the Western oligarchy. In China, the political elite dominate in the marriage between big business and the state. China thus has a neo-feudal corporatism; while the West has corporate neo-feudalism, with the political elite of the West clearly taking their marching orders from the business elite. The one is the mirror of the other. China, therefore, could aptly be called Red Fascism, and has formed a temporary and unstable alliance with the corporate fascists of the West. It is therefore no surprise that the Davos billionaires and the Western corporate elite get along so marvelously with the overlords in Beijing. They are, in effect, kissing cousins, and seem to have now, a great love affair for one another.
The problem was, and is, in allowing corporations to become too big – so big and so powerful that their masters become our masters, and both liberty and democracy, and constitutional rule, die in the process.
“Never give in. Never give in. Never, never, never, never—in nothing, great or small, large or petty—never give in, except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force. Never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy.” – Winston Churchill
It matters not which names and faces, or which rich men’s clubs are at the top. The central problem now, which is at the centre of all the rest, is the hyper-concentration of economic power, which inevitably overshadows, comes to dominate, and finally to devour democracy, freedom and constitutional rule. Again, the answer is clear and implicit, once the analysis goes deep enough for the problem to be, finally, clearly seen. Break up the corporate giants which have taken over democracy world-wide; restore freedom, democracy and constitutional rule – and don’t let it happen again!
“For myself I am an optimist – it does not seem to be much use to be anything else.” – Winston Churchill
*
Do not obsess over the names, faces, or rich men’s clubs. They may be of some relevance and may shed some light. (See: C. Wright Mills’, The Power Elite; Peter Phillips’ Giants: The Global Power Elite; Noam Chomsky’s, Class Warfare, Year 501, and Necessary Illusions; John Perkins’ A Game As Old As Empire; Naomi Klein’s, The Shock Doctrine; Maude Barlow’s, Global Showdown; Susan George’s, Shadow Sovereigns; John Pilger’s, The New Rulers of the World; Murray Bookchin’s, The Ecology of Freedom; David C. Korten’s, When Corporations Rule The World, and, The Great Turning; Vandana Shiva’s, Oneness vs The 1%; and my own work, Enlightened Democracy, and, The People vs The Elite. In fact, I would urge people to go to the library today, or open another browser window right now, and order one or all of these books, which should be considered required reading for every thinking person over the age of 16.) But in any case, it is a straight-forward class analysis, or sociological analysis, which gets to the heart of it.
The names and clubs and organizations, including all of the Fortune 1,000 biggest corporations, and in particular, the media and PR industry (the heirs to Goebbels), along with the banking, pharmaceutical, Big Oil, Big Tech, agribusiness, petrochemical, biotech and arms industries, and all of the major international organizations, such as the IMF, World Bank, ECB, BIS, WTO, WEF, Opus Dei, Vanguard, Blackrock, Academi, NATO and the Fed, must be addressed, and very boldly and swiftly addressed, surely. But what is central is that we realize that it was a mistake, a terrible mistake, to allow either political OR economic power to become hyper-concentrated. The answer is implicit once the analysis is clear, and the problem is, finally, clearly understood.
In short, failure to place checks and balances and strict limits on economic power, as we did with political power, has meant the slow slide from liberal democracy to global corporate oligarchy, and fascism, over the span of 200 years. Now we reap the rewards of our neglect. But it is not too late to change course.
*
It was not for no reason that Mexico’s most famous artist, Diego Rivera, painted his most famous work, a grand mural, in the early 20th century, depicting Nelson Rockefeller pulling the levers that ruled the world. (See the film, The Cradle Will Rock.) Thomas Jefferson warned us in 1812 that the moneyed aristocracy were already then trying to take over. We ignored his prescient warning, and we have paid the price.
“For the first time in its history, Western Civilization is in danger of being destroyed internally by a corrupt, criminal ruling cabal which is centered around the Rockefeller interests, which include elements from the Morgan, Brown, Rothschild, Du Pont, Harriman, Kuhn-Loeb, and other groupings as well. This junta took control of the political, financial, and cultural life of America in the first two decades of the twentieth century.” – Carroll Quigley
And to Quigley’s assessment (remembering he was a Yale elite and CFR historian and member, as well as Bill Clinton’s mentor), we can add the newcomers to the global plutocracy: Gates, Buffet, Bezos, Zuckerberg, Soros, et al.
Bob Marley said it more directly, and therefore better:
“Tell the children the truth…
Babylon system is the vampire,
falling empire,
suckin’ the blood of the sufferers….
We’ve been trodded on the wine press
much too long
Rebel, rebel.”
*
Note that the original democratic theorists, framers and philosophers and revolutionaries, never intended for democracy to be practiced on a vast scale. They intended democracy to be kept close to the people, since over-centralization spells the inevitable death, fast or slow, of both liberty and democracy.
The American Revolution sought to create a constitutional democracy out of 13 British colonies, a scale less than a quarter of the current size of the United States; and further, at least in Thomas Jefferson’s salient and most sensible view, to decentralize powers in a federation of states, where the member states have the greater power, and not the central federal government.
In 1776, the original 13 colonies which formed the new republic of the United States had a population of 2.5 million souls, spanning a landmass of 360,000 square miles. The US today has more than 100 times the population and spans ten times the landmass. Moreover, not only has the demographic and landmass scale exploded in size, but concentration of economic and political power, and cultural power, have been hyper-concentrated in just five cities: New York, Washington DC, San Fransisco, Chicago and LA. Can democracy or freedom survive such extreme concentration and centralization of power? It is very doubtful – and that is without even considering powerful external forces, such as Basel, the City of London, Frankfurt, and their international banking elites, or Davos or Beijing – the five cities that, along with the American five, rule the Western world, and most of the globe.
The French Revolution sought democracy for an average size European country, not a vast landmass. Rousseau himself imagined democracy on the scale of his home country of tiny Switzerland. Ancient Athens itself was a tiny city state, with a population of 30,000 – a city-state smaller than London in the year 1500, at the height of the Renaissance.
(See E. F. Schumacher, Small Is Beautiful. Small is necessary, for freedom, democracy, justice, equality and peace, as well as being beautiful. Decentralized powers in horizontal networks or federations of mutual protection, trade, cultural exchange and mutual aid, are the future of humanity, despite the ghastly power struggles and desperate death throws of a dying age of empires.)
It is highly questionable whether the experiment in modern democracy can succeed when both political power and economic power, along with media power and cultural power, are extremely centralized. In fact, economic power absolutely must be greatly decentralized, and democratized – that means, as a minimum, anti-trust legislation, sensible democratic regulation, and the break up of the corporate giants, including above all, the banks, investment firms and the media; and political power must be made truly democratic, and constitutionally ruled, and likely decentralized, at least to some degree, as well. Both steps are both necessary and urgently required if either freedom or democracy are to survive. Bear that in mind as you consider carefully what I am about to say.
“Where there is little or no public opinion, there is likely to be bad government, which sooner or later becomes autocratic government.” – William Lyon Mackenzie King
“If some nations have too much history, we have too much geography.” – William Lyon Mackenzie King
I hate to say it, but if the people cannot unite, then it may be better that the truly giant scale nations of the US and Canada break up. (The same goes for India, Brazil and Argentina.) Some states, provinces and regions will be willing to deal with reality, and will be willing to deal with our pressing and urgent problems – the greatest of which are the ecological crisis, the social crisis of vast and growing inequality, and the war on democracy – in ways that boldly address the issues, while preserving and safeguarding, and actually strengthening, democracy, freedom and constitutional rule. Other states, provinces or regions will choose denial, or technocratic corporate fascism, or more likely, a combination of both. If certain regions break off to become independent, it may result in increased chances of freedom and democracy surviving, and of the human species surviving, itself. But that is a last resort, at least in the near term, and I hope it will not come to that.
*
China, under its current neo-Maoist/Leninist/corporatist rule, is simply a totalitarian police state. It is now the biggest economic super-power on Earth, but it is in no way worthy of emulation in political terms by thoughtful or moral people. It can in no way be emulated or imitated as a political model by any sane person or nation. Despite that fact, the Western corporate oligarchy of billionaire robber barons, seated at Davos, “the new Palace of Versailles”, and “the new royal court”, along with their well-paid political prostitutes in government, are importing exactly that model of Orwellian totalitarianism and technocracy from China, across the Western world. This is worse than neoliberalism and corporate globalization, as disastrous as that was and is. This is technocratic fascism. And Beijing and Davos, as unlikely and as short-lived as that marriage may be, are equally gleeful in their messianic quest to deliver, or rather, violently impose, that technocratic and deeply authoritarian, Huxleyan and Orwellian model onto the world.
China, however, despite its appalling political system, is doing some few things right. The massive, light speed build-out of a green energy and light rail transportation infrastructure is one. The use of a publicly owned central bank to fund and fuel the nation’s infrastructure building is another. Only fools would dismiss these models – because they simply work. And yes, of course, they can be connected to and integrated with a truly democratic, constitutional framework for society, which respects and upholds freedom and human rights – if the people insist that it be done in this way, and in no other.
Ellen Brown is probably the leading figure world-wide in terms of strategies and analysis for how to break free from the imperial dominance and life-sucking vampirism of the global banking elite. Here is what she has to say on the subject.
“Today, the best model for that approach (a publicly owned central bank) is China, which funds infrastructure by borrowing from its own state-owned banks. Like all banks, they create loans as bank credit on their books, which is then repaid with the proceeds of the projects created with the loans. There is no need to tap up the central bank or rich investors or the tax base. Government banks can create money on their books just as central banks and private banks do.
For Mexico however, (another world leader in that regard, with its new president) using its public banks as China does would be something for the future, if at all. Meanwhile, AMLO has been a trailblazer in showing how a national public banking system can be initiated quickly and efficiently. (Obrador plans to create 3,238 public bank branches in 2021 alone, in a single year.) The key, it seems, is just to have the political will — along with massive support from the public, the legislature, local business leaders and the military.”
– Mexico’s AMLO Shows How It’s Done, by Ellen Brown
A good summary overview is presented by the Strategic Culture Foundation:
(And you know you are doing something right when the quite literally fascist and censorship happy Big Tech giants suppress you as much as they can, as is happening with rapidly accelerating speed to more and more good people, and noble citizen’s groups and independent media, and as has happened to the Strategic Culture Foundation, as well.)
“In Ellen Brown’s brilliant new article “Mexico’s AMLO Shows How It’s Done”, the researcher and national banking advocate made the powerful point that the only way to properly fight the neo-liberal order is for nations of the west to follow the lead of Mexico’s current President Lopez Obrador who recently announced the creation of a new network of national banks – of which over 3238 branches will be in operation by 2021. Obrador’s stated aim is to have 13 000 branches built across Mexico which would far outnumber the total number of all private banks and will also provide a vital tool for the economic liberation of Mexico.
This act is nothing short of heresy in the corridors of the neoliberal priesthood of our modern age. The “economic foundation” upon which today’s globalized world are premised assert that nation states may not participate in the marketplace. No price controls, no protective tariffs, no bank regulation and certainly no national banks. Following this gospel, nations are permitted to do war and promote various forms of population control… but nothing that pollutes the purity of the supposedly “free market”….”
And on historical context, Benjamin Franklin, and the creation of the first American public bank:
“It is here no coincidence that the leading proponent of national banking and productive credit in America was also the leading scientist who trumped all elite scientific minds of Europe when he discovered the principle of electricity in 1752. Benjamin Franklin and his vast network of leading collaborators across Europe and America never saw a distinction between “subjective moral sciences” and “objective a-moral physics”. The foundational documents and also the first national banking system of America (upon which other republics in South and Central America modelled themselves in the coming years) were based upon this idea of Natural Law. This insight was the basis for Franklin’s 1727 opus on the Necessity for a Paper Currency where Franklin argued that value was not located in gold, or silver, or land or even demand per se, but rather in the creative powers of a people!
The consolidation of America’s revolutionary war debt incurred by each of the 13 colonies into a unified federal credit transformed the unpayable debt “into a national blessing” as Ben Franklin’s protégé Alexander Hamilton (first Treasury Secretary) laid out in his famous Reports on a National Bank and On Manufactures in 1791. In opposition to the early free traders and monetarists who wished America would end its protective tariff, stay agrarian and allow Britain to maintain its global monopoly on industry, Hamilton and Franklin understood this would undo the entire revolutionary cause resulting in America’s eventual re-absorption back into the empire…..”
“While China uses its debt as an active asset to invest into great long term infrastructure projects which thus extinguish the original debt while increasing the productive powers of labor, America’s private central banking system under the Federal Reserve merely creates debt for speculation and turning poor Americans into slaves. Just look at the $14 trillion the treasury printed to bail out failing speculators in 2008-2010. Or look at the $9 trillion printed by the Fed to do the same. Nothing was invested in the real economy during this time.
What a different world we could have created…
NAFTA’s long awaited death is a start, as are Obrador’s vital reforms… however a fight needs to still occur before (we) can finally break colonized nations (including the USA) out from the clutches of the financial oligarchy and their self-imploding deep state managers.”
– Mathew Ehret, Strategic Culture Foundation
*
It seems to me that the West can no longer brag about being democratic or free. We have imported the Chinese model of totalitarianism. Russia is now more free and democratic than the West. They experienced totalitarianism, and rejected it in favour of democracy and freedom. We foolishly went in the opposite direction. Yet we pretend we are still living in 1971. We are living in a dream world.
It is a bizarre state of the world. The thinking left has always been anti-authoritarian, as is the moderate grassroots right; but the left periodically loses its marbles and gets caught up in messianic fervour, as they did when many of them fell for the lie that the Bolshevik Revolution was a liberating force, as they did when many of them backed the Jacobins, and as they are doing now, in supporting censorship and the “new normal” of authoritarianism. The right and left need to talk more, scream less – and question everything, including, above all, their own sacred dogmas.
“To improve is to change; to be perfect is to change often.”
– Winston Churchill
Again, the only conclusion that can be sensibly drawn by people who are paying attention, and who understand what is going on, is that the global empire of neo-feudal, technocratic corporate oligarchy, run primarily by banking elites and other corporate oligarchs, must be swiftly and decisively removed from power – and that, by now, will require nothing less than a non-violent democratic revolution.
“An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.”
– Winston Churchill
“It is not enough that we do our best; sometimes we must do what is required.” – Winston Churchill
The way to freedom, and to a better world for all, is becoming clear. The only question that remains, is: do the people have the will to choose it, or will they choose by default, by not choosing, and so, choose to be slaves?
J. Todd Ring,
March 10, 2021
Epilogue
It is imperative that we realize something else. That is, that uniformity and centralization of power are weaknesses now, not strengths: diversity and decentralization are our greatest powers. We need many leaders in every nation, not one. And we need a web of diversity, united in our diversity, with multiple centres of leadership and power, if we are to succeed against this juggernaut, which is the global fascist corporate empire, and its mirrored and (for now) partnered twin, of totalitarian Communist China.
Remember that Tony Blair and his cadre of corporate prostitutes took over the British Labour Party in 1994, and still, more than a quarter century later, the grassroots of the party, and the democratic left of Britain, has been unable to recapture their party from the professional boot-lickers who high-jacked it, nearly three decades ago. This is what happens when you over-centralize power: the entire movement is easily derailed or taken over, and effectively neutralized, and neutered.
If we allow ourselves to fall into the easy habit of baying and cajoling and fawning at the feet of leaders, whether they be sincere or diabolical, legitimate or not, the results will be the same: we will lose, by over-centralizing power in too few hands, making the heads of our movements easy to cut off, co-opt, silence, or simply bribe.
We cannot afford to put all our eggs in one basket, or all our faith in one leader, no matter how sincere or compelling they may seem, or may be. We must be diverse, and we must be pluralistic, and that means we must also avoid over-centralization, and be consciously and deliberately decentralized, pluralistic, multifaceted and decentralized, out of necessity. That is our resilience, and therefore, our greatest power.
When there is no single head to cut off, co-opt, silence or bribe, or otherwise neutralize, that means, with sufficient will and determination, we are unstoppable.
We have many diverse people in the world, and with many diverse views. We should look at diversity as a strength, and decentralized, horizontal networks of shared power, as a strength. We need to unite the people, yes – that is critical. But we do not need uniformity or centralization. That will only weaken us, and ensure failure.
We can have different groups, organizations and social movements, each with their own diverse formal or more often informal membership, and each with their own distinct views – and hopefully they are internally diverse as well, though united in common cause around an issue, or a shared vision or set of values or goals. The same is true with a broad network of social movements and activist groups in a nation, or globally: we must unite, yes, and that means we must discover our common ground, and affirm it, and thus unite in common cause. But we do not have to agree on everything, nor do we need to all share the same religion, ideology, political affiliation or philosophy. We can have diverse views, and we should. We simply recognize those views and values which we have in common, and we recognize what goals we share in common. From that, we can act in unison, as a symphony, or a great wave or tsunami, when we are ready, and it is time to coordinate local, national, regional or global action.
Note that the pivotal moment in WWII came about as a result of the over-concentration of power in the Nazi regime. Hitler had given strict orders that no large troops movements could occur without his express consent. He had also given express orders not to wake him while he slept. When D-Day came, and thousands of Allied forces gave their lives to storm the beaches, and finally broke through the line of fascist machine gun nests, the Nazi line was broken, and the battle would be lost without immediate reinforcements. No reinforcements came, for the reasons explained above – for the reason of over-centralization of power. That was the crack, the fault line, the grave weakness of fascism, and of all forms of excessive concentration of power, which led to the defeat of the fascists in WWII.
We must learn from history now, and not repeat its mistakes.
The critical difference we must understand is the difference between is between a pyramid structure of top-down power, and a web of horizontally shared power. The pyramid structure is what we are used to, and what our society has been based on for some 5,000 years. But a quiet revolution in anthropology has shown that that was the aberration, not the norm of our vastly longer history on Earth. But more to the point, what is most essential to realize, is that there is another way, and a better way – and that is the way of shared power, and unity through horizontal networks, alliances or federations of shared power.
The dying way is the way of pyramidal, top-down, hierarchical power structures, great centralizations and concentrations of power in the hands of a few; patterns of dominance and submission, and empire. The way of renaissance and rebirth, the democratic way, and the way to freedom, justice, and the healing of our world, is the rejection of empires and hierarchies, and the sharing of power in federations and alliances among equals. That is how we will succeed. We will not succeed by replicating the past, by replicating the way of demagogues and false messiahs, of over-centralization, or empire. We win by breaking the mould, and shattering the clay feet.
It is time for freedom. It is time for a new renaissance. It is time for peace, and the healing of our world. And that, is entirely within our power.
It is up to you. And it is up to me. It is up to all of us. There is no white night that is going to ride in and save us – and if one does, be wary of giving away your power. It is up to us. It is up to the people. There will be natural leaders, and there will be many of them. And that is precisely what we need.
We do not need hegemony. We do not need uniformity. We need to unite, and create a unity amidst our glorious human diversity, and we need it now.
J. Todd Ring,
March 22, 2021
From Bankers Ruling The World, To The People Ruling The Bankers
Posted in Uncategorized with tags 1%, activism, analysis, Davos, democracy, elite, fascism, freedom, Great Reset, history, liberty, Martial Law, oligarchy, philosophy of history, plutocracy, police state, political economy, political philosophy, political theory, politics, revolution, social analysis, social commentary, social philosophy, social psychology, social theory, sociology, strategy, totalitarianism, uniting the people, unity, vision, WEF on March 10, 2021 by jtoddring~ And Rebuilding And Healing The World In The Process ~
“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.” – Thomas Jefferson
“I pray we shall crush the moneyed aristocracy in its infancy, for already it bids defiance to our laws and seeks a contest of strength with our democratic government.” – Thomas Jefferson, 1812
“Once a nation parts with the control of its currency and credit, it matters not who makes the nations laws. Usury, once in control, will wreck any nation. Until the control of the issue of currency and credit is restored to government and recognized as its most sacred responsibility, all talk of the sovereignty of parliament and of democracy is idle and futile.” – William Lyon Mackenzie King (1874-1950) Prime Minister of Canada, Founder of the Bank of Canada
“There’s a class war going on alright – and we’re winning.”
– Warren Buffet
“We will coup whoever we want! Deal with it.” – Elon Musk
“Let them eat bugs.” – Bill Gates
Some paint a rosy picture of the West, which is clearly moving rapidly from corporate oligarchy to fascism. Some paint a rosy picture of Communist China as a better alternative. I most definitely reject them both. Both are forms of authoritarianism and tyranny, and neither is compatible with democracy, freedom, constitutional rule or human rights. We can and must do better than these two mutually toxic regimes. It is time for a great reset, alright – but one designed by the people, for the people, and not by the literally fascist business elite – and with liberty and justice for all.
*
“Truth is not whatever you want it to be. It is what it is. And you must bend to its power or live a lie.” – Miyamoto Musashi
Both privatization and state control of the economy have proved to be deeply problematic, to put it mildly. In fact, both of have been disastrous. Both have sown great ecological destruction, and each of them has sown its own kind of tyranny. You can have the tyranny of the state, or you can have the tyranny of being ruled by giant corporate empires, monopolies and cartels.
Well, how about freedom, for a change? How about no tyranny, instead of choosing between the flavour of tyranny we shall have? Marxist-Leninists, or the Chinese mandarins and technocrats of Beijing, will bring you one kind of tyranny. Milton Friedman and the Chicago Boys, with their “Washington consensus” of neoconservative/neoliberal “free market” ideology – which means freedom for the giant corporations and the super-rich, and discipline, if not poverty and chains, for everybody else – will bring you a kind of neo-feudal corporatism that represents another kind of tyranny. But maybe the people are sick of tyranny by now. Maybe they want to choose something better. It think it is time. And I think the people are ready for something better.
Rather than giant corporate empires controlling the commons, and rather than the state controlling the commons, there is a third way, which does not involve the snake oil peddling of people like Tony Blair, and his trained poodle show, but instead, involves empowering the people at the level of the grassroots. It is neither the state nor private empires that are best fit to govern the commons. The people themselves are best fit to govern the commons, history unsurprisingly shows, since it is an axiom that power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. And moreover, the people are best fit to govern themselves, likewise.
This is the direction that we must move: not towards ever greater concentration and centralization of power – power is already dangerously and greatly hyper-concentrated and over-centralized; but towards decentralization of power, which means, towards greater democracy and greater freedom.
The business elite, the global corporate elite, want to consolidate all power in their hands. That should rightly make sensible people deeply wary. We have tried that before, and it has failed, and failed repeatedly. We tried that with Stalin, with Mao, with Hitler and with Mussolini, with Pinochet, and with a whole string of Third World dictators. When we gather together all power in society into the hands of the few, tyranny is the inevitable result.
I can think of only one example of where it worked well, and that was in Tibet, where they had something akin to Plato’s vision of the philosopher kings – and even with regards to Tibet, the Dalai Lama has said that the Tibetan people are ready for democracy. But Tibet, remember, was a rare exception – everywhere else that we look in history or in the world today, when all power is concentrated in a few hands at the top, in great pyramids of top-down control, tyranny results, and the result is a nightmare society, and a gulag.
Some people say that contemporary China is a good model, a better model, because China acted swiftly and effectively on covid, or because China has a strong and growing economy – but China is a totalitarian police state. Just look at their social credit system, which is tied into their contact tracing and surveillance system, which is also tied into their new digital currency and payments system, where if you spit on the sidewalk, or jaywalk, or, heaven forbid, say something critical of the government, you can find yourself barred from getting on a train or bus or plane, or taking out a loan or a mortgage, or simply placed under permanent house arrest. I think we should think twice before importing that model to the West, or to the rest of the world. But that is precisely what the Davos billionaire club of the new global corporate empire is actively doing right now, and with break-neck speed: they are importing the totalitarian model from China across the West and around the world.
Then there are others who are critical, quite sensibly, of both corporate tyranny and authoritarian statism, who want to dissolve or radically shrink the government. They do not understand that, we must first decentralize power to the nation-state, from its current globalized hyper-concentration in the hands of unelected and unaccountable corporate elites. That first step is crucial, and cannot be bypassed. This is absolutely critical for us to understand now.
Only when we have wrested power from the billionaire corporate elite, who are now transnational and globalist, as well as being quite literally fascist, by temporarily strengthening nation-states and national democracies, can we have any hope of freedom. Later, in the future, and potentially soon, we can decentralize the powers of the nation-state, in turn. But we must get the order right, and not put the cart before the horse, or we will not achieve freedom or democracy, constitutional rule or respect for our inalienable human rights, but will only achieve a permanence and consolidation of the currently reigning empire, which is now a form of global plutocracy, and a literally fascist global corporate rule. If we do not soon come to understand this core reality, and precisely what must be done about it, then we are doomed to a future that is dark and dystopian indeed.
While the class warfare continues to be waged by the 1% against the 99%, and the corresponding economic warfare and psychological warfare intensify, along with the war on democracy, the faux left seeks crumbs for the masses. It is appalling, disgusting, and morally bankrupt.
We must have regulation of the biggest corporations, and especially of the financial sectors in Wall Street, Bay Street and the City of London; we must tax currency speculation; we must put in place sensible and strong anti-trust action, along with capital controls; we must close the tax loopholes and tax all personal income over $1 million a year at 90%, and all personal wealth over $100 million at 90%, and use it to end poverty and green our society; we must abrogate and reject any and all “trade deals” that place corporate powers over and above the powers of sovereign democratic parliaments; and we must create publicly owned, democratic central banks, with sound money and sound monetary policies that benefit the people, and not just the richest fraction of a percent. These are among the core, concrete steps that we must take if we are serious about economic recovery and prosperity, jobs for all, or are concerned about having any possibility for serious action on either social justice or the environment, or any possibility of resisting the global take-over and fascist architecture that is currently being imposed by both the Western corporate elite of Davos and the Chinese Communist Party of Beijing, who are now in a joint partnership to rule the world. All talk about minimum wage, UBI or inclusivity, health care, environmental protection, climate action, or financial relief for the people, is idle and futile talk, essentially, until and unless we have the courage and the clarity of mind to do these few essential and urgently needed things, which can no longer be avoided. The people, both left and right, need to stop squabbling and stop day dreaming, and unite; then get on with dealing with reality.
*
An important aside should be mentioned here. Some still think Bitcoin is a passing fad, but the best economic analysts that I know of, all say that Bitcoin is here to say, and is going to reach mass adoption level soon, at which time, it will replace the US dollar as the preferred mode of transaction and most used currency globally. My point here is that while I agree that Bitcoin is far superior to fiat paper money, which is prone to inevitable devaluation and ultimate collapse; and it is vastly preferable to any government- or corporate-controlled, or central bank-controlled digital currency, because it is decentralized and resistant to censorship, manipulation, or authoritarian impulses or schemes; and while it is a far safer, more secure store of value (for savings and investment, along with gold, silver and heritage seeds), since it is encrypted, cannot be stolen or confiscated, has a finite and fixed supply, and thus does not devalue, but will continue to increase in value, despite short-term volatility; and while it will indeed help, and probably help greatly, in decentralizing the control of money, exchange and trade, and thus remove monopoly and cartel players, such as states and giant corporations, from unduly stifling or controlling free human interaction and exchange, and will greatly diminish the powers of the banking and financial elite; despite all that, I do not believe that Bitcoin alone can solve all our problems. I think that should be clear enough. I think it would be unwise if not dangerously naïve to blindly assume that it can.
Crossing our fingers and hoping for the best is not a sound strategy for dangerous times. We at least need fallback strategies, complimentary strategies, and contingency plans, not just in mind, but executed and in place, so that we do not put all our hopes in a new technology, be it Bitcoin or any other, to be our salvation.
At the very least, we should also look to other ways to reign in the big corporations, the billionaire plutocracy, and especially the banking elite, who now effectively rule the world. In short, while I think Bitcoin is a smart long-term investment and store of value, as well as a proven viable means of economic transaction, exchange and trade, on local, national and international levels, right now, it is not technology which will save us, though indeed it will play an important role.
A quick summary of the last 50 years is needed here. (We will go into much more detail in a moment, below.) With the birth of neoliberalism and corporate globalization, and the financialization of the economy which accompanied it, which began 50 years ago, in 1971, the West, and the US in particular, slowed, and then eventually, by and large, stopped investing in infrastructure and R&D, while offshoring production and profits both. That is precisely the set of policies and trends which must be reversed. We must de-financialize the economy, reverse the deregulation of the economy, and particularly the banking sector, rebuild the real economy, and invest in infrastructure, research and development; and along with that, and in order to do that, we must have three elements brought swiftly into place: We must unite the people, we must dethrone the globalist and quite literally fascist corporate/banker oligarchy, and we must have a fresh vision for going forward. I have outlined both the problems and the strategic path and policy vision needed, in over 500 published papers and my first two published books, Enlightened Democracy, and, The People vs The Elite. Now, we will go into further detail here in terms of the political philosophy, the political-economic policy platform, and the very achievable but also very bold vision that we need to transcend and resolve our very pressing and urgent problems in the early 21st century, to create real freedom, real democracy, and a better world for all.
Policy, vision and philosophy, and a fresh approach to politics, economics, and life in general, is what will save us from the dark age we are now heading into with all speed. Banning and abolishing private central banks and creating democratically controlled public central banks, along with sensible legislation to reign in the corporate giants, remove big money from electoral politics, reverse the financialization of the economy, and to restore actual functioning democracy, along with human rights, constitutional rule and freedom, is the greater and most central task ahead. Bitcoin can aid in that process of dethroning the ruling banking elite and the global corporate plutocracy, but we need to look to other, bold methods, as well. There is no way around this. It simply must happen, and now.
As to political philosophy: Do I side with Karl Marx, Milton Friedman or Klaus Schwabbe, representing (1) statist oligarchy, (2) neoliberal globalization and state-sponsored capitalism, and (3) technocratic corporate fascism, respectively? None of the above. I side with Jefferson, who was far more prescient, and had far more common sense, than any of the three.
I’ll take Jefferson in the short term, and most definitely so, over Marx, Friedman, or the neo-fascists of the likes of Davos and Klaus Schwabe – let us, that is, restore a functioning constitutional democracy, free from any elitist or authoritarian control fetishes, and let the people democratically decide the rest; and Kropotkin in the long term, when we are ready for something that takes freedom and democracy to a further, higher level yet.
Please read on, and we will “unpack” these great and pressing, world-shaping issues together.
“To change something, build a new model that makes the old model obsolete.”
– Buckminster Fuller
*
Here is just one example of how profoundly lost “the left” is at present, for critical perspective and context. I will show my own response to a Twitter comment by Jimmy Dore, who is generally lucid and quite sensible, which in turn was Jimmy Dore’s response to Bernie Sanders, who in 2020, completely caved in to the big money controlled Democratic party establishment, and the rule of Wall Street and the City of London over all.
While the class warfare continues to be waged by the 1% against the 99%, and the corresponding economic warfare and psychological warfare intensify, along with the war on democracy, the faux left seeks crumbs for the masses. It is appalling, disgusting, and morally bankrupt.
Here is an example. Remember, without officially backing out of the 2020 US presidential race, and being open and honest about it, Bernie stopped campaigning in the spring of 2020, effectively throwing the fight, though he was in a position to win the US presidential race, easily beating the befuddled Biden and callous Kamala.
Now he is boasting about getting a one-time pittance cheque of financial relief for the people, which for most families doesn’t even cover a single month’s living expenses, while he simultaneously sold the people out, along with AOC and all the “progressives” in Congress, in voting for a nearly $2 trillion relief package for the Wall Street corporate elite. Even the “leading” “progressives” are selling the people down the river. Here is Bernie boasting of his bread crumb championship on Twitter:
Bernie Sanders
@BernieSanders
“What will the $1,400 direct payments in the American Rescue Plan mean for you and your family?”
Mar 18, 2021·Twitter
To which, Jimmy Dore responded:
“It means you all failed spectacularly again and Democrats will be the minority party in 2022.”
@jimmydore Mar 18, 2021·Twitter
We must look more deeply. And we must be far more bold, or we will be slaves.
*
How did the first Great Depression come about? It was a combination of drought, financial speculation, wild over-leveraging by the moneyed elite, and deregulation (actually a basic absence of regulation). And what do we have now, in 2021? Severe and escalating ecological crisis is causing recurring and increasingly severe storms, floods, landslides, wildfires, crop failure, and drought. Financial speculation is at an all-time high – far higher than in the roaring ’20s which preceded the crash of ’29. And Slick Willie Bill Clinton, and other neoliberal and neoconservative crony capitalists, have deregulated the economic and financial system – which was not fixed after the first major tremor hit, in the financial crisis of 2008. (Remember that I warned of that coming crisis beforehand, when everyone was saying that things are just rosy, and would remain that way.) The tsunami is coming, and few are prepared. Few even see it, and very few dare to imagine it, though it be very, very real.
In light of that impending economic crash that is now heading our way, and in light of the global take-over of the world by big business, with its attendent class warfare, economic warfare and psychological warfare, and war on democracy, an examination of the options for protecting and aiding the people is in order, and is desperately needed now.
Beware the military industrial media complex.
“Those who have put out men’s eyes reproach them of their blindness.”
– Milton
Clarity and leadership are not to be found from the media talking heads, nor from the ostensibly ruling figure heads of government who are the political elite; nor, certainly, from the billionaire corporate elite, who are now busy devouring the planet and the people, along with their freedoms and their democracy.
“Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” – Lord Acton
“Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others.”
– Winston Churchill
Let’s shed a little light on the subject of democracy vs plutocracy. It is high time, and urgently needed now.
*
Nearly 90 years ago, it was FDR, the New Deal, and the United States, which led the world out of the Great Depression. In 2021, while most of the world continues to stagnate, and to slide toward social, political and economic implosion, it is Andres Obrador, Mexico, Bitcoin, and the entrepreneurs of Nigeria, among others, who are leading the world out of the economic mire. History makes for strange bedfellows indeed, and many remarkable surprises.
Upon his election in 2018, Mexico’s new President, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador announced the first phase of his New Deal with an “Every Young Person to Work” program inspired by FDR which he described saying:
“I have had this idea since I read how President Franklin Delano Roosevelt pulled the United States out of the 1930s’ crisis. What did he do, in a tremendous economic crisis? He decided to put the whole U.S. people to work. And he decided to put young people to work, and he paid them a dollar a day, for every young person. But his idea was full employment. That is, a job for everyone. That idea stuck in my head, because Roosevelt lifted the United States out of the crisis, and for me, he was therefore, if not the best President, one of the best that the United States has had—Franklin Delano Roosevelt, by that action, by that decision. Now we are going to do something similar: All young people to work.”
This is what the US, UK, Canada, Europe, and most nations of the world need: a new vision, a new social contract, and a New Deal that serves the people, the 99%, and that creates jobs and economic vitality, and rebuilds the nations of the world, post-lockdown. Tax the super-rich and the giant corporations, and above all, tax financial speculation, and use that vast wealth to build green infrastructure, creating full employment and economic prosperity in the process – while, most critically, safeguarding and strengthening democracy, freedom, constitutional rule and human rights. And I think Ellen Brown is right: all positive change hinges on freeing the people from the stranglehold that the international banking elite has on them and on the democracies and nations of the world – and that, in turn, hinges on the creation of a democratically controlled public central bank for each sovereign nation. Without that, we will remain serfs, and will continue our rapid slide from serfdom, into slavery.
“You have enemies? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something,
sometime in your life.” – Winston Churchill
“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.” – Winston Churchill
“It ain’t over ’till it’s over.” – Yogi Berra
*
Mexico, with a new President, AMLO (his initials), is throwing off the disastrous policies of neoliberalism and corporate globalization, which decimated the country over the preceding 36 years, and, most critically, is rebuilding the nation and the economy while retaining and strengthening constitutional democracy. In that sense, and for these reasons, Mexico under Andres Obrador’s leadership, is truly showing leadership for the world, while the US, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Europe, are being turned into Third World police states, run by and for the global, frankly neo-fascist corporate elite.
Here is Ellen Brown on the new Mexico, which is now rising from the ashes, like a phoenix taking wing:
“The new president has held to his campaign promises. In 2019, his first year in office, he did what Donald Trump pledged to do — “drain the swamp” — purging the government of technocrats and institutions he considered corrupt, profligate or impeding the transformation of Mexico after 36 years of failed market-focused neoliberal policies. Other accomplishments have included substantially increasing the minimum wage while cutting top government salaries and oversize pensions; making small loans and grants directly to farmers; guaranteeing crop prices for key agricultural crops; launching programs to benefit youth, the disabled and the elderly; and initiating a $44 billion infrastructure plan. López Obrador’s goal, he says, is to construct a “new paradigm” in economic policy that improves human welfare, not just increases gross domestic product.””
*
“Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.”
– Winston Churchill
“A fanatic is one who can’t change his mind and won’t change the subject.” – Winston Churchill
“Personally, I’m always ready to learn, although I do not always like being taught.” – Winston Churchill
We need to not only think outside the box – we need to smash the boxes, shatter the walls of our thinking, and draw on the best ideas and models, from wherever we can find them.
“The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes.” – Winston Churchill
The grassroots moderate right, meaning libertarians on the right, and many conservatives, understand that a privately owned central bank, such as the Fed or ECB, can never be trusted to serve the people, but instead serves transnational banking elites, at the great suffering and expense of the people, along with the demise of democracy, freedom, sovereignty, and the real, productive economy as well. The left needs to clue into that central fact. But the right needs to overcome its ideological fetish which makes it fanatically scream like Dark Age priests whenever anyone suggests that government programs can do some good for the people; or, when anyone suggests, or shows with conclusive, overwhelming evidence, that laissez-faire capitalism and deregulation are a social, ecological and economic disaster, which they indisputably are. Both the left and the right have blind spots, and giant ones, and both are clueless in certain important regards.
“A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.”
– Ralph Waldo Emerson
John Lennon said, and he was right:
“You think you’re so clever and classless and free, but you’re still fucking peasants as far as I can see.”
And to that I would add, You think you’re so pious, and sanctified indeed, but you’re still squabbling children, as far as I can see.
Remember this: It was Abraham Lincoln, a Republican President, who issued the Emancipation Proclamation, abolishing slavery. It was Teddy Roosevelt, a Republican President, who defied the corrupted Democratic party establishment, as well as the corrupted Republican party establishment, and, riding on a wave of democratic populist uprising, challenged the richest man in America, John D. Rockefeller, and the biggest corporation in America, Standard Oil, using anti-trust legislation against a company thought to be “too big to fail”, and won important landmark victories. And it was Dwight D. Eisenhower, a Republican President, who, in his farewell address to the nation, gave us his ominous message, to, “beware the military industrial complex.” The liberals and the left tend to think that they have a monopoly on virtue, intelligence, and common sense. Clearly, they do not. Let the petty bickering be over. We have serious disagreements, yes, it is true. But we have more in common than we have differences between us. And we have common cause. If the people cannot now see, that it truly is, as Vandana Shiva has said, Oneness vs The 1%, or as the title of my own work expressed it, The People vs The Elite, then we are frankly doomed to a future none of us would wish to imagine, much less be a party to.
First, we must unite the people, in order to remove the sociopaths at the top, from their position as de facto rulers of the world. Then, we can come back, and debate and discuss, every other issue under the sun. First things first: remove the plutocrats from power. That will require unity. And we have no time to lose.
Dogma, and the idolatry of ideology, must be swept aside. We must now take a fresh look at things, or remain imprisoned, and effectively neutered and self-eviscerating, by way of our stubborn clinging to our narrow and outworn preconceptions. We need a resurgence and rediscovery of our power, our basic dignity, and our confidence – and we need a corresponding resurgence of basic humility and open-mindedness to go with it. Above all, we must unite the people – unite the 99%, or at least the great majority, all of whom are now peasants and serfs, and understand that we have common ground and common cause, and a common opponent, in the ruling 1%. Without these factors in place, and reaffirmed, our future will remain nothing but bleak, and positively dystopian.
*
The Central Problem
The problems of the world are many, but the central problem is, as Aldous Huxley indicated: a vast over-centralization of power. You do not need any kind of “conspiracy theory” to see the obvious, undeniable fact: “the moneyed aristocracy”, as Thomas Jefferson called them, the business elite, have taken over. Remember that Jesus drove the money changers from the temple. This is not a new problem; however, we have let the problem go on so long without seriously addressing it, that we now face a dystopian world that is ruled by self-serving plutocrats and billionaire corporate oligarchs. The great majority of the people now know that this is the undeniable, obvious truth. The question is, what are we going to do about it?
I am not anti-business, but I am certainly anti-fascist. And if the people persist in allowing a tiny handful of global bankers and other billionaire business elites to effectively rule the world, and bend every nation to its will, then the result will be global fascism. How much more clear can this be?
“Conspiracy theory is a term that is used to poo-poo institutional analysis.” – Noam Chomsky
Remember that fascism does not necessarily mean people in Nazi uniforms goose-stepping in the streets before giant banners. Fascism is more malleable than that – and contemporary fascists have become masters of camouflage and PR. Fascism, although it always has a scapegoat, or several of them, is not even necessarily racist. What is the essential core of fascism, is a hyper-concentration of power in the hands of a very small number of people, in a pyramidal and hierarchical power structure, which is decidedly opposed to any real or meaningful, functioning democracy. That, we clearly have now, and world-wide.
It is a multi-cultural, multi-racial, gay- and women-friendly, “inclusive”, “sustainable” and cosmopolitan, even humanitarian face, that the Western corporate oligarchy presents to the world, but it is fascist plutocracy nonetheless, to its rotting black heart. Make no mistake.
You can put lipstick on a pig, but it will still remain a pig. What we have now in the West is corporate fascism with a progressive liberal face, but it is still fascism.
*
Political Philosophy, and Political Reality
I reference Chomsky often, simply because he is one of the best minds in terms of institutional analysis, that is, political-economic and social analysis. That does not mean he is infallible, of course. None of us should pretend to omniscience. And I’ve seen Chomsky be flatly wrong on at least three major subjects. But he is generally correct in his views, and is in general extremely lucid. And I agree with him on several major points, which are relevant here.
“If the Nuremburg Trials were held today, every US President since WWII would be hung.”
“It’s not that the elite like torture. They’re just indifferent to it.”
The English philosopher Thomas Hobbes’ answer to human problems was to concentrate power in the hands of an elite few, who would keep the rest from tearing each others’ throats out. He famously wrote that life before “civilization” was “nasty, brutish and short”. He knew nothing of anthropology, which had yet to be invented, and knew nothing of the longer history of humanity. He simply assumed that his own cut-throat society of 17th century Europe, with its incessant warring tribes, and its conniving, scheming, deceitful, duplicitous and petty tyrants, was the universal norm of humanity, and he presumed that things must have been even worse before great and holy kings came to power. His view of humanity is dark, pessimistic, cynical, and jaundiced in the extreme, and based in pure ignorance and projection. But it was his recipe for politics which is most troubling: concentrate all power in the hands of a ruling elite, because human beings cannot be trusted with power. How much more obviously self-contradictory can this be? If you do not trust people with power, then why would you give some people great and vast powers? Thomas Jefferson destroyed the Hobbesian fallacy and rationalization for oligarchic elite rule, in a single line:
“If you can’t trust men to govern themselves, how can you trust them to govern others?”
Again, the problems we see in human society are manyfold, and have many causes, but the central and most common root, is a grossly excessive concentration and over-centralization of power. All social orders are human creations – whether we realize it or not. And when you create a social order that is based upon hierarchical power structures, and with great concentrations of power, what you get is a magnet for corruption and for sociopaths. Good people are attracted to positions of leadership, to be sure; but so too, are corrupt and self-serving individuals and sociopaths strongly attracted to positions of power. What’s more, when power is decentralized, then abuses of power are small, because no one person or group has great power. But when power is highly concentrated and highly centralized, then great abuses of power become possible, and become virtually guaranteed. The problem, therefore, is not a question of who is in power, but what power structures do we have, or do we tolerate.
Placing strict limits on any form of concentrated power in human society, therefore, should be viewed as a matter of common sense. That must include, of course, the political powers, namely the government; the military, paramilitary, police and “intelligence” powers; religious powers, namely the church (freedom of religion, conscience and belief is essential, and so too, is separation of church and state – for the protection of both); cultural powers, namely the media, the advertising industry, and the rest of the PR industry; and also economic powers – namely, the giant corporations, which must now be broken up, and the billionaire elite, whose vast wealth must be redistributed (with a 100% tax on all personal wealth over $100 million), not so much for reasons of wealth distribution, but for reasons of reigning in their economic power, which now has come to overrule and to effectively eviscerate and nullify the peoples’ democracies.
Decentralization of powers, in horizontal networks and federations of shared power, and the break up and abolition of any form of hyper-concentrated power – commonly known as political, military, economic or financial empires – is akin to mutual disarmament. We can either have mutual disarmament, or we can have an ever-escalating arms race that will end, finally, in our own self-annihilation. The same is true, and even more fundamentally true, and more urgent, with regards to mutual disarmament in the sense of dissolving all excessive concentrations of power – including above all, the Fortune 1,000 biggest corporations, and the financial empires of the super-rich. We can either respond boldly, swiftly and with common sense, by addressing the roots of the problem, rather than papering them over with pretty words and superficial, grossly inadequate, mild reforms and cosmetic changes; or we can watch the world descend rapidly into a dystopian dark age of neo-feudal corporate oligarchy and fascism. These are our only two choices remaining now – and the sensible choice, requires bold and swift action, and nothing less.
We know now from studies in human psychology that there is roughly 1% of the population who are sociopaths. Presumably it is a similar level in all societies and in all ages, though there may be major variances. We can expect, therefore, that a small percentage of people, in any age and any society, will be so cold-blooded and callous, as to be willing to do absolutely anything in the pursuit of their own greed, narrow self-interest, self-aggrandizement, and power. This should not be shocking to anyone.
I firmly believe that Chomsky was right in saying that, “The great majority of people have basically decent impulses.” (And science has confirmed that fact. See Rifkin, The Empathic Civilization, Eisler, The Chalice and The Blade, Bookchin, The Ecology of Freedom, and Kropotkin, Mutual Aid.) This explains why most people find it hard to imagine that anyone could behave in such evil ways – most people want to be happy, but they are not willing to step on someone else’s throat, in order to achieve what they think will make them happy: and so, they imagine that all human beings have such restraint, conscience, compassion, or basic human decency – but this is an erroneous assumption, for clearly, not all do. Naiveté has never been a very good protection against the evil that exists in the world. A sober-minded optimism, which deals squarely with the good and the evil, the noble and the ignoble, the sensible and the deluded, and the deranged, is a better way to proceed.
Do not underestimate what the sociopathic few are willing to do in order to further their own self-interests, their accumulation of never-ending vast wealth, their hubris and infantile sense of grandiosity, and their lust for power. Can it happen here? Can fascism, that is, happen again, and happen here? It not only can, it has. It is here.
Remember too, that Mussolini, who invented modern fascism, and so is properly fit to define it, said that fascism is properly called corporatism – and it is the merger of the business elite with the state. That too, we have now.
Or we can look at how FDR defined fascism: it is the take-over of government by big business. Anyway you look at it, what we have now is not liberal democracy, as even the Ivy league colleges confirm, but oligarchy, plutocracy, corporatism, and however you want to name it, it is the merger of business with the state, whereby, outside of China, North Korea, Cuba and North Vietnam, almost universally, big business has taken over the governments of the world. That, by any reasonable definition, is fascism.
China, under neo-Maoist/Leninist/corporatist rule, is the mirror image of the corporate neo-feudalism, technocracy or corporate fascism of the Western oligarchy. In China, the political elite dominate in the marriage between big business and the state. China thus has a neo-feudal corporatism; while the West has corporate neo-feudalism, with the political elite of the West clearly taking their marching orders from the business elite. The one is the mirror of the other. China, therefore, could aptly be called Red Fascism, and has formed a temporary and unstable alliance with the corporate fascists of the West. It is therefore no surprise that the Davos billionaires and the Western corporate elite get along so marvelously with the overlords in Beijing. They are, in effect, kissing cousins, and seem to have now, a great love affair for one another.
The problem was, and is, in allowing corporations to become too big – so big and so powerful that their masters become our masters, and both liberty and democracy, and constitutional rule, die in the process.
“Never give in. Never give in. Never, never, never, never—in nothing, great or small, large or petty—never give in, except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force. Never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy.” – Winston Churchill
It matters not which names and faces, or which rich men’s clubs are at the top. The central problem now, which is at the centre of all the rest, is the hyper-concentration of economic power, which inevitably overshadows, comes to dominate, and finally to devour democracy, freedom and constitutional rule. Again, the answer is clear and implicit, once the analysis goes deep enough for the problem to be, finally, clearly seen. Break up the corporate giants which have taken over democracy world-wide; restore freedom, democracy and constitutional rule – and don’t let it happen again!
“For myself I am an optimist – it does not seem to be much use to be anything else.” – Winston Churchill
*
Do not obsess over the names, faces, or rich men’s clubs. They may be of some relevance and may shed some light. (See: C. Wright Mills’, The Power Elite; Peter Phillips’ Giants: The Global Power Elite; Noam Chomsky’s, Class Warfare, Year 501, and Necessary Illusions; John Perkins’ A Game As Old As Empire; Naomi Klein’s, The Shock Doctrine; Maude Barlow’s, Global Showdown; Susan George’s, Shadow Sovereigns; John Pilger’s, The New Rulers of the World; Murray Bookchin’s, The Ecology of Freedom; David C. Korten’s, When Corporations Rule The World, and, The Great Turning; Vandana Shiva’s, Oneness vs The 1%; and my own work, Enlightened Democracy, and, The People vs The Elite. In fact, I would urge people to go to the library today, or open another browser window right now, and order one or all of these books, which should be considered required reading for every thinking person over the age of 16.) But in any case, it is a straight-forward class analysis, or sociological analysis, which gets to the heart of it.
The names and clubs and organizations, including all of the Fortune 1,000 biggest corporations, and in particular, the media and PR industry (the heirs to Goebbels), along with the banking, pharmaceutical, Big Oil, Big Tech, agribusiness, petrochemical, biotech and arms industries, and all of the major international organizations, such as the IMF, World Bank, ECB, BIS, WTO, WEF, Opus Dei, Vanguard, Blackrock, Academi, NATO and the Fed, must be addressed, and very boldly and swiftly addressed, surely. But what is central is that we realize that it was a mistake, a terrible mistake, to allow either political OR economic power to become hyper-concentrated. The answer is implicit once the analysis is clear, and the problem is, finally, clearly understood.
In short, failure to place checks and balances and strict limits on economic power, as we did with political power, has meant the slow slide from liberal democracy to global corporate oligarchy, and fascism, over the span of 200 years. Now we reap the rewards of our neglect. But it is not too late to change course.
*
It was not for no reason that Mexico’s most famous artist, Diego Rivera, painted his most famous work, a grand mural, in the early 20th century, depicting Nelson Rockefeller pulling the levers that ruled the world. (See the film, The Cradle Will Rock.) Thomas Jefferson warned us in 1812 that the moneyed aristocracy were already then trying to take over. We ignored his prescient warning, and we have paid the price.
“For the first time in its history, Western Civilization is in danger of being destroyed internally by a corrupt, criminal ruling cabal which is centered around the Rockefeller interests, which include elements from the Morgan, Brown, Rothschild, Du Pont, Harriman, Kuhn-Loeb, and other groupings as well. This junta took control of the political, financial, and cultural life of America in the first two decades of the twentieth century.” – Carroll Quigley
And to Quigley’s assessment (remembering he was a Yale elite and CFR historian and member, as well as Bill Clinton’s mentor), we can add the newcomers to the global plutocracy: Gates, Buffet, Bezos, Zuckerberg, Soros, et al.
Bob Marley said it more directly, and therefore better:
“Tell the children the truth…
Babylon system is the vampire,
falling empire,
suckin’ the blood of the sufferers….
We’ve been trodded on the wine press
much too long
Rebel, rebel.”
*
Note that the original democratic theorists, framers and philosophers and revolutionaries, never intended for democracy to be practiced on a vast scale. They intended democracy to be kept close to the people, since over-centralization spells the inevitable death, fast or slow, of both liberty and democracy.
The American Revolution sought to create a constitutional democracy out of 13 British colonies, a scale less than a quarter of the current size of the United States; and further, at least in Thomas Jefferson’s salient and most sensible view, to decentralize powers in a federation of states, where the member states have the greater power, and not the central federal government.
In 1776, the original 13 colonies which formed the new republic of the United States had a population of 2.5 million souls, spanning a landmass of 360,000 square miles. The US today has more than 100 times the population and spans ten times the landmass. Moreover, not only has the demographic and landmass scale exploded in size, but concentration of economic and political power, and cultural power, have been hyper-concentrated in just five cities: New York, Washington DC, San Fransisco, Chicago and LA. Can democracy or freedom survive such extreme concentration and centralization of power? It is very doubtful – and that is without even considering powerful external forces, such as Basel, the City of London, Frankfurt, and their international banking elites, or Davos or Beijing – the five cities that, along with the American five, rule the Western world, and most of the globe.
The French Revolution sought democracy for an average size European country, not a vast landmass. Rousseau himself imagined democracy on the scale of his home country of tiny Switzerland. Ancient Athens itself was a tiny city state, with a population of 30,000 – a city-state smaller than London in the year 1500, at the height of the Renaissance.
(See E. F. Schumacher, Small Is Beautiful. Small is necessary, for freedom, democracy, justice, equality and peace, as well as being beautiful. Decentralized powers in horizontal networks or federations of mutual protection, trade, cultural exchange and mutual aid, are the future of humanity, despite the ghastly power struggles and desperate death throws of a dying age of empires.)
It is highly questionable whether the experiment in modern democracy can succeed when both political power and economic power, along with media power and cultural power, are extremely centralized. In fact, economic power absolutely must be greatly decentralized, and democratized – that means, as a minimum, anti-trust legislation, sensible democratic regulation, and the break up of the corporate giants, including above all, the banks, investment firms and the media; and political power must be made truly democratic, and constitutionally ruled, and likely decentralized, at least to some degree, as well. Both steps are both necessary and urgently required if either freedom or democracy are to survive. Bear that in mind as you consider carefully what I am about to say.
“Where there is little or no public opinion, there is likely to be bad government, which sooner or later becomes autocratic government.” – William Lyon Mackenzie King
“If some nations have too much history, we have too much geography.” – William Lyon Mackenzie King
I hate to say it, but if the people cannot unite, then it may be better that the truly giant scale nations of the US and Canada break up. (The same goes for India, Brazil and Argentina.) Some states, provinces and regions will be willing to deal with reality, and will be willing to deal with our pressing and urgent problems – the greatest of which are the ecological crisis, the social crisis of vast and growing inequality, and the war on democracy – in ways that boldly address the issues, while preserving and safeguarding, and actually strengthening, democracy, freedom and constitutional rule. Other states, provinces or regions will choose denial, or technocratic corporate fascism, or more likely, a combination of both. If certain regions break off to become independent, it may result in increased chances of freedom and democracy surviving, and of the human species surviving, itself. But that is a last resort, at least in the near term, and I hope it will not come to that.
*
China, under its current neo-Maoist/Leninist/corporatist rule, is simply a totalitarian police state. It is now the biggest economic super-power on Earth, but it is in no way worthy of emulation in political terms by thoughtful or moral people. It can in no way be emulated or imitated as a political model by any sane person or nation. Despite that fact, the Western corporate oligarchy of billionaire robber barons, seated at Davos, “the new Palace of Versailles”, and “the new royal court”, along with their well-paid political prostitutes in government, are importing exactly that model of Orwellian totalitarianism and technocracy from China, across the Western world. This is worse than neoliberalism and corporate globalization, as disastrous as that was and is. This is technocratic fascism. And Beijing and Davos, as unlikely and as short-lived as that marriage may be, are equally gleeful in their messianic quest to deliver, or rather, violently impose, that technocratic and deeply authoritarian, Huxleyan and Orwellian model onto the world.
China, however, despite its appalling political system, is doing some few things right. The massive, light speed build-out of a green energy and light rail transportation infrastructure is one. The use of a publicly owned central bank to fund and fuel the nation’s infrastructure building is another. Only fools would dismiss these models – because they simply work. And yes, of course, they can be connected to and integrated with a truly democratic, constitutional framework for society, which respects and upholds freedom and human rights – if the people insist that it be done in this way, and in no other.
Ellen Brown is probably the leading figure world-wide in terms of strategies and analysis for how to break free from the imperial dominance and life-sucking vampirism of the global banking elite. Here is what she has to say on the subject.
“Today, the best model for that approach (a publicly owned central bank) is China, which funds infrastructure by borrowing from its own state-owned banks. Like all banks, they create loans as bank credit on their books, which is then repaid with the proceeds of the projects created with the loans. There is no need to tap up the central bank or rich investors or the tax base. Government banks can create money on their books just as central banks and private banks do.
For Mexico however, (another world leader in that regard, with its new president) using its public banks as China does would be something for the future, if at all. Meanwhile, AMLO has been a trailblazer in showing how a national public banking system can be initiated quickly and efficiently. (Obrador plans to create 3,238 public bank branches in 2021 alone, in a single year.) The key, it seems, is just to have the political will — along with massive support from the public, the legislature, local business leaders and the military.”
– Mexico’s AMLO Shows How It’s Done, by Ellen Brown
A good summary overview is presented by the Strategic Culture Foundation:
(And you know you are doing something right when the quite literally fascist and censorship happy Big Tech giants suppress you as much as they can, as is happening with rapidly accelerating speed to more and more good people, and noble citizen’s groups and independent media, and as has happened to the Strategic Culture Foundation, as well.)
“In Ellen Brown’s brilliant new article “Mexico’s AMLO Shows How It’s Done”, the researcher and national banking advocate made the powerful point that the only way to properly fight the neo-liberal order is for nations of the west to follow the lead of Mexico’s current President Lopez Obrador who recently announced the creation of a new network of national banks – of which over 3238 branches will be in operation by 2021. Obrador’s stated aim is to have 13 000 branches built across Mexico which would far outnumber the total number of all private banks and will also provide a vital tool for the economic liberation of Mexico.
This act is nothing short of heresy in the corridors of the neoliberal priesthood of our modern age. The “economic foundation” upon which today’s globalized world are premised assert that nation states may not participate in the marketplace. No price controls, no protective tariffs, no bank regulation and certainly no national banks. Following this gospel, nations are permitted to do war and promote various forms of population control… but nothing that pollutes the purity of the supposedly “free market”….”
And on historical context, Benjamin Franklin, and the creation of the first American public bank:
“It is here no coincidence that the leading proponent of national banking and productive credit in America was also the leading scientist who trumped all elite scientific minds of Europe when he discovered the principle of electricity in 1752. Benjamin Franklin and his vast network of leading collaborators across Europe and America never saw a distinction between “subjective moral sciences” and “objective a-moral physics”. The foundational documents and also the first national banking system of America (upon which other republics in South and Central America modelled themselves in the coming years) were based upon this idea of Natural Law. This insight was the basis for Franklin’s 1727 opus on the Necessity for a Paper Currency where Franklin argued that value was not located in gold, or silver, or land or even demand per se, but rather in the creative powers of a people!
The consolidation of America’s revolutionary war debt incurred by each of the 13 colonies into a unified federal credit transformed the unpayable debt “into a national blessing” as Ben Franklin’s protégé Alexander Hamilton (first Treasury Secretary) laid out in his famous Reports on a National Bank and On Manufactures in 1791. In opposition to the early free traders and monetarists who wished America would end its protective tariff, stay agrarian and allow Britain to maintain its global monopoly on industry, Hamilton and Franklin understood this would undo the entire revolutionary cause resulting in America’s eventual re-absorption back into the empire…..”
“While China uses its debt as an active asset to invest into great long term infrastructure projects which thus extinguish the original debt while increasing the productive powers of labor, America’s private central banking system under the Federal Reserve merely creates debt for speculation and turning poor Americans into slaves. Just look at the $14 trillion the treasury printed to bail out failing speculators in 2008-2010. Or look at the $9 trillion printed by the Fed to do the same. Nothing was invested in the real economy during this time.
What a different world we could have created…
NAFTA’s long awaited death is a start, as are Obrador’s vital reforms… however a fight needs to still occur before (we) can finally break colonized nations (including the USA) out from the clutches of the financial oligarchy and their self-imploding deep state managers.”
– Mathew Ehret, Strategic Culture Foundation
*
It seems to me that the West can no longer brag about being democratic or free. We have imported the Chinese model of totalitarianism. Russia is now more free and democratic than the West. They experienced totalitarianism, and rejected it in favour of democracy and freedom. We foolishly went in the opposite direction. Yet we pretend we are still living in 1971. We are living in a dream world.
It is a bizarre state of the world. The thinking left has always been anti-authoritarian, as is the moderate grassroots right; but the left periodically loses its marbles and gets caught up in messianic fervour, as they did when many of them fell for the lie that the Bolshevik Revolution was a liberating force, as they did when many of them backed the Jacobins, and as they are doing now, in supporting censorship and the “new normal” of authoritarianism. The right and left need to talk more, scream less – and question everything, including, above all, their own sacred dogmas.
“To improve is to change; to be perfect is to change often.”
– Winston Churchill
Again, the only conclusion that can be sensibly drawn by people who are paying attention, and who understand what is going on, is that the global empire of neo-feudal, technocratic corporate oligarchy, run primarily by banking elites and other corporate oligarchs, must be swiftly and decisively removed from power – and that, by now, will require nothing less than a non-violent democratic revolution.
“An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.”
– Winston Churchill
“It is not enough that we do our best; sometimes we must do what is required.” – Winston Churchill
The way to freedom, and to a better world for all, is becoming clear. The only question that remains, is: do the people have the will to choose it, or will they choose by default, by not choosing, and so, choose to be slaves?
J. Todd Ring,
March 10, 2021
Epilogue
It is imperative that we realize something else. That is, that uniformity and centralization of power are weaknesses now, not strengths: diversity and decentralization are our greatest powers. We need many leaders in every nation, not one. And we need a web of diversity, united in our diversity, with multiple centres of leadership and power, if we are to succeed against this juggernaut, which is the global fascist corporate empire, and its mirrored and (for now) partnered twin, of totalitarian Communist China.
Remember that Tony Blair and his cadre of corporate prostitutes took over the British Labour Party in 1994, and still, more than a quarter century later, the grassroots of the party, and the democratic left of Britain, has been unable to recapture their party from the professional boot-lickers who high-jacked it, nearly three decades ago. This is what happens when you over-centralize power: the entire movement is easily derailed or taken over, and effectively neutralized, and neutered.
If we allow ourselves to fall into the easy habit of baying and cajoling and fawning at the feet of leaders, whether they be sincere or diabolical, legitimate or not, the results will be the same: we will lose, by over-centralizing power in too few hands, making the heads of our movements easy to cut off, co-opt, silence, or simply bribe.
We cannot afford to put all our eggs in one basket, or all our faith in one leader, no matter how sincere or compelling they may seem, or may be. We must be diverse, and we must be pluralistic, and that means we must also avoid over-centralization, and be consciously and deliberately decentralized, pluralistic, multifaceted and decentralized, out of necessity. That is our resilience, and therefore, our greatest power.
When there is no single head to cut off, co-opt, silence or bribe, or otherwise neutralize, that means, with sufficient will and determination, we are unstoppable.
We have many diverse people in the world, and with many diverse views. We should look at diversity as a strength, and decentralized, horizontal networks of shared power, as a strength. We need to unite the people, yes – that is critical. But we do not need uniformity or centralization. That will only weaken us, and ensure failure.
We can have different groups, organizations and social movements, each with their own diverse formal or more often informal membership, and each with their own distinct views – and hopefully they are internally diverse as well, though united in common cause around an issue, or a shared vision or set of values or goals. The same is true with a broad network of social movements and activist groups in a nation, or globally: we must unite, yes, and that means we must discover our common ground, and affirm it, and thus unite in common cause. But we do not have to agree on everything, nor do we need to all share the same religion, ideology, political affiliation or philosophy. We can have diverse views, and we should. We simply recognize those views and values which we have in common, and we recognize what goals we share in common. From that, we can act in unison, as a symphony, or a great wave or tsunami, when we are ready, and it is time to coordinate local, national, regional or global action.
Note that the pivotal moment in WWII came about as a result of the over-concentration of power in the Nazi regime. Hitler had given strict orders that no large troops movements could occur without his express consent. He had also given express orders not to wake him while he slept. When D-Day came, and thousands of Allied forces gave their lives to storm the beaches, and finally broke through the line of fascist machine gun nests, the Nazi line was broken, and the battle would be lost without immediate reinforcements. No reinforcements came, for the reasons explained above – for the reason of over-centralization of power. That was the crack, the fault line, the grave weakness of fascism, and of all forms of excessive concentration of power, which led to the defeat of the fascists in WWII.
We must learn from history now, and not repeat its mistakes.
The critical difference we must understand is the difference between is between a pyramid structure of top-down power, and a web of horizontally shared power. The pyramid structure is what we are used to, and what our society has been based on for some 5,000 years. But a quiet revolution in anthropology has shown that that was the aberration, not the norm of our vastly longer history on Earth. But more to the point, what is most essential to realize, is that there is another way, and a better way – and that is the way of shared power, and unity through horizontal networks, alliances or federations of shared power.
The dying way is the way of pyramidal, top-down, hierarchical power structures, great centralizations and concentrations of power in the hands of a few; patterns of dominance and submission, and empire. The way of renaissance and rebirth, the democratic way, and the way to freedom, justice, and the healing of our world, is the rejection of empires and hierarchies, and the sharing of power in federations and alliances among equals. That is how we will succeed. We will not succeed by replicating the past, by replicating the way of demagogues and false messiahs, of over-centralization, or empire. We win by breaking the mould, and shattering the clay feet.
It is time for freedom. It is time for a new renaissance. It is time for peace, and the healing of our world. And that, is entirely within our power.
It is up to you. And it is up to me. It is up to all of us. There is no white night that is going to ride in and save us – and if one does, be wary of giving away your power. It is up to us. It is up to the people. There will be natural leaders, and there will be many of them. And that is precisely what we need.
We do not need hegemony. We do not need uniformity. We need to unite, and create a unity amidst our glorious human diversity, and we need it now.
J. Todd Ring,
March 22, 2021
Share this:
6 Comments »